Traderboersenboard - Einzelnen Beitrag anzeigen - Sprit-Ersatz

Benjamin · 31-01-2006, 18:17

Bush will push green fuel
State of the Union will include an ethanol plug. Will it matter?

By Adam Lashinsky, FORTUNE senior writer

January 31, 2006

NEW YORK (FORTUNE) - Among those paying very close attention to the president's State of the Union address tonight will be folks from every sector of the energy industry, eager to hear what the petroleum president has to say about alternative energy.

Yes, you read that right. President Bush -- former oil man, son of an oil man, coached by the former chief executive of Halliburton (Research) – will hold forth Tuesday night on why America needs to be doing a better job of promoting renewable fuels.

"I agree with Americans who understand being hooked on foreign oil is an economic problem and a national security problem," Bush said in a recent interview with CBS, according to the Associated Press. That's really an astounding statement. Coming from Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton, it would be ho hum. But coming from George W. Bush it actually means something.

This is the Nixon going to China of renewable fuels. Of course, if the price of a barrel of oil was closer to $40 instead of $70, it's unlikely President Bush would even be talking about alternative energy. But oil isn't at $40, and Bush is talking about ways to cut down our use of petroleum, 60 percent of which we import.

So what will the president actually propose? It seems likely he plans to build on the modest success of last year's energy bill, which, among other things, mandated the use of 7.5 billion gallons of ethanol by 2012.

Last year, Americans consumed about 4 billion gallons of ethanol, nearly all of it added to gasoline in a 90 percent gas/10 percent ethanol blend. In the interview with CBS as well as a long chat last week with the Wall Street Journal, the president has been talking up the virtues of flexible fuel vehicles that can burn a blend of 85 percent ethanol called E85. These are ordinary cars whose engines include a sensor that allow them to burn the higher ethanol blend. The president could propose tax credits for driving flexible-fuel vehicles or give automakers tax breaks for building them.

Already, there are more than 5 million flex-fuel vehicles on the road in the U.S. The car companies built them primarily to satisfy corporate fuel-efficiency requirements. The problem with promoting flex-fuel cars as well as E85 as the alternative fuel to run them is what former CIA Director James Woolsey calls the classic "Alphonse-Gaston" problem. Not only do most people who own one not know they already have a car that can burn gasoline or ethanol, there's almost nowhere for them to fill up with ethanol. Fewer than 600 of the 170,000 gasoline stations in the U.S. sell E85. It isn't clear who's going first here, Alphonse or Gaston. (Woolsey is involved with a group called the Set America Free Coalition. Theirthoughts on energy security are worth reading.)

To be a success, ethanol will have to be made from agricultural products other than corn. Such cellulosic ethanol could come from prairie grass and wood chips, for example. The Department of Energy has estimated that ethanol derived from such sources could make up 30 percent of overall gasoline consumption in 25 years. (Click here for more about how ethanol could help break the country's dependence on foreign oil. )

Private industry already is working on ways to ramp up ethanol production. But if President Bush is serious about helping that process along, he'll need to suggest ways to make flex-fuel vehicles more than an empty promise. Of course, just by talking about alterative fuels the president sends a signal, especially to the gas-guzzling, anti-conservation crowd he knows well. Look where China is 35 years after President Nixon made it possible for the West to business there.

31-01-2006, 18:17	#23
Benjamin TBB Family Registriert seit: Mar 2004 Beiträge: 10.374	Bush will push green fuel State of the Union will include an ethanol plug. Will it matter? By Adam Lashinsky, FORTUNE senior writer January 31, 2006 NEW YORK (FORTUNE) - Among those paying very close attention to the president's State of the Union address tonight will be folks from every sector of the energy industry, eager to hear what the petroleum president has to say about alternative energy. Yes, you read that right. President Bush -- former oil man, son of an oil man, coached by the former chief executive of Halliburton (Research) – will hold forth Tuesday night on why America needs to be doing a better job of promoting renewable fuels. "I agree with Americans who understand being hooked on foreign oil is an economic problem and a national security problem," Bush said in a recent interview with CBS, according to the Associated Press. That's really an astounding statement. Coming from Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton, it would be ho hum. But coming from George W. Bush it actually means something. This is the Nixon going to China of renewable fuels. Of course, if the price of a barrel of oil was closer to $40 instead of $70, it's unlikely President Bush would even be talking about alternative energy. But oil isn't at $40, and Bush is talking about ways to cut down our use of petroleum, 60 percent of which we import. So what will the president actually propose? It seems likely he plans to build on the modest success of last year's energy bill, which, among other things, mandated the use of 7.5 billion gallons of ethanol by 2012. Last year, Americans consumed about 4 billion gallons of ethanol, nearly all of it added to gasoline in a 90 percent gas/10 percent ethanol blend. In the interview with CBS as well as a long chat last week with the Wall Street Journal, the president has been talking up the virtues of flexible fuel vehicles that can burn a blend of 85 percent ethanol called E85. These are ordinary cars whose engines include a sensor that allow them to burn the higher ethanol blend. The president could propose tax credits for driving flexible-fuel vehicles or give automakers tax breaks for building them. Already, there are more than 5 million flex-fuel vehicles on the road in the U.S. The car companies built them primarily to satisfy corporate fuel-efficiency requirements. The problem with promoting flex-fuel cars as well as E85 as the alternative fuel to run them is what former CIA Director James Woolsey calls the classic "Alphonse-Gaston" problem. Not only do most people who own one not know they already have a car that can burn gasoline or ethanol, there's almost nowhere for them to fill up with ethanol. Fewer than 600 of the 170,000 gasoline stations in the U.S. sell E85. It isn't clear who's going first here, Alphonse or Gaston. (Woolsey is involved with a group called the Set America Free Coalition. Theirthoughts on energy security are worth reading.) To be a success, ethanol will have to be made from agricultural products other than corn. Such cellulosic ethanol could come from prairie grass and wood chips, for example. The Department of Energy has estimated that ethanol derived from such sources could make up 30 percent of overall gasoline consumption in 25 years. (Click here for more about how ethanol could help break the country's dependence on foreign oil. ) Private industry already is working on ways to ramp up ethanol production. But if President Bush is serious about helping that process along, he'll need to suggest ways to make flex-fuel vehicles more than an empty promise. Of course, just by talking about alterative fuels the president sends a signal, especially to the gas-guzzling, anti-conservation crowd he knows well. Look where China is 35 years after President Nixon made it possible for the West to business there.